ACTION BASTARD ([info]miss_lithi) wrote,
@ 2009-05-25 20:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Dude, weld your zipper shut.
Happy Pants loser with minimum wage job has 20 kids with 11 women. At least.



Ganked from article:

On paper, he has 20 possibly 21 children.

With a minimum wage job, he can't afford to support them all.

What is the state to do?

Desmond Hatchett, 29, told WVLT he wasn't out to set a record, though he certainly holds it in Knox County Juvenile Child Support Court.

Hatchett's children range in age from newborn 11.

There are at least 11 mothers; probably several more.

Constitutionally, there is nothing the state can do to limit him from having more.

"I had four kids in the same year. Twice." Desmond Hatchett told Volunteer TV.



Okay, 11 women fighting for child support from a guy making minimum wage. Some of them are lucky to receive $1.98 per month from him. Have a Butterfinger, kid. On Dad.

Words? I got some words:

CONDOMS
CONDOMS
CONDOMS
BIRTH CONTROL PILLS
SPONGE
KEEP IT IN YOUR DAMN PANTS
KEEP YOUR LEGS WELDED SHUT
CONDOMS

Actually I'm not as mad at Happy Pants as I thought I would be. Let's not forget the women who make their living sucking the Welfare and child support teets. If you have unprotected sex with a man who has at least 2 baby mamas and get knocked up, don't expect me to feel sorry for you.

Four kids in the same year, twice. Yikes.



(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]koilungfish
2009-05-26 10:49 am UTC (link)
So the child support people can't just go over one night and give him a two-brick vasectomy? :P

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]miss_lithi
2009-05-27 04:17 am UTC (link)
In a perfect world, Koi.

By the way, did you get me email? Tomorrow's out, going to dinner. But I'm free the rest of the week. :) *snuggie*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]koilungfish
2009-05-27 11:38 am UTC (link)
:: sigh :: True ...

I did, I just suck at answering emails at the moment. I'm going out for dinner tonight and Friday ... so I guess we won't see each other until next week? :: hugs!::

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]miss_lithi
2009-05-28 02:43 pm UTC (link)
All right. Thing is my time may be rather limited as I'm set to start a new job next week. I'll email you with definite times. *snugs*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]koilungfish
2009-05-28 05:56 pm UTC (link)
All right :) Best of with the new job.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]seryan
2009-05-26 12:09 pm UTC (link)
I swear, there is an inverse-proportion ration between # of children vs contribution to society.

Oh, and to these people, I would just like to say: $1.98 IS AT LEAST THREE CONDOMS AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD GIVES THEM AWAY FREE! You are not doing your offspring any favors, and they deserve better than you douchebags.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]seryan
2009-05-26 05:17 pm UTC (link)
I'm relieved to see, at the end of the article, that he doesn't plan to have any more. I'd like to know what, other than keeping him in a reproduction-free environment, bunging him in jail is supposed to do. It's not like he can earn child support money there.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]miss_lithi
2009-05-27 04:22 am UTC (link)
Even though he claims that's all the kids he's going to have, it depends on whether or not he suits up and his woman (women) are using birth control.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]seryan
2009-05-27 12:07 pm UTC (link)
I was initially going to say he should have a vasectomy, then I remembered that a) he works fast food and b) you're in the US.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(9 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…